Pre-Shipment Inspection Protocol: Our 10-Step Quality Gate Before Container Loading

01. OQC Random Sampling per AQL 2.5/4.0

Every inspection begins with determining the correct sample size. We do not inspect every single bag in the shipment. That would be impractical for orders of 500 or 5,000 units, and it is statistically unnecessary when you follow a proper random sampling plan.

We use Inspection Level II, Normal, under ANSI ASQ Z1.4 / ISO 2859-1. Here is how the sample size is determined for typical handbag order quantities:

To take a concrete example: if your order is 800 crossbody bags, our sample size is 80 units. We accept the batch if we find 5 or fewer major defects (AQL 2.5) and 7 or fewer minor defects (AQL 4.0). If we find 6 major defects or 8 minor defects, the entire batch is rejected and must be sorted before a re-inspection.

The key word is random. Our inspectors do not allow the factory to hand-pick the samples. We physically go to the packed cartons, use a random number generator to select carton numbers, and then randomly select individual units within those cartons. This eliminates selection bias and gives you statistically valid confidence that the sample represents the entire lot.

We classify defects into three categories. Critical defects (AQL 0) include anything that compromises safety or regulatory compliance, such as nickel release from hardware exceeding REACH limits or phthalate levels in PVC exceeding CPSIA thresholds. One critical defect in the sample triggers an automatic rejection. Major defects (AQL 2.5) are functional failures that would cause a customer to return the bag, such as a torn seam or a broken zipper. Minor defects (AQL 4.0) are cosmetic issues that a customer might notice but would not necessarily trigger a return, such as a slightly uneven stitch line or a loose thread inside a hidden pocket.

For a deeper dive into the mathematics and application of AQL sampling, see our dedicated AQL Inspection Guide.

02. Appearance Check: Leather Grain, Color Consistency, Surface Defects

Appearance is the most subjective element of quality control, which is exactly why we standardize it with objective tools and conditions. Every visual inspection at our facility is conducted under a D65 standard light source with 800 lux minimum illumination. Why D65? Because it replicates natural daylight with a correlated color temperature of 6,500 Kelvin, revealing color variations that would be invisible under warm warehouse lighting.

Leather Grain Verification

For genuine leather bags, grain consistency is critical. We check that the grain direction runs the same way on all external panels: the front flap, the back panel, the side gussets, and the strap. Natural leather has a directionality to its grain pattern, and mismatched panels create a patchwork look that signals poor quality to even untrained eyes.

For PU and vegan leather bags, we look for delamination, the separation of the polyurethane coating from the fabric backing. This defect is notoriously hard to spot on a single piece but becomes obvious when you gently flex the material. We flex each panel of every sampled bag at a 90-degree angle three times and look for any whitening or cracking along the fold line. This test catches about 8% of PU leather defects in our experience.

Color Consistency

We place each sampled bag next to the gold master sample, the approved production sample that was signed off by the client during the pre-production stage. Using a GretagMacbeth Color-Eye 7000A spectrophotometer when available, or at minimum a visual comparison under D65 light, we verify that all panels fall within a Delta-E (ΔE) tolerance of 1.5 or less. A ΔE of 1.0 is imperceptible to most viewers. A ΔE of 3.0 is clearly noticeable. Our threshold of 1.5 provides a comfortable margin for acceptable color variation.

We also check for color blocking within a single bag. It is surprisingly common for the front panel to be cut from a different dye lot than the back panel, especially when the factory uses two different rolls of material. We inspect each bag as a complete unit, comparing every external panel against every other.

Surface Defects

We systematically scan each bag's exterior surface for the following defect types, documented in our defect atlas:

• Scratches and scuffs: Any linear mark visible from 30 cm distance under D65 light is recorded. Location matters. A scratch on the bottom of the bag may be minor. A scratch on the front flap is major.
• Pilling and fibrillation: For fabric bags, pilling (small balls of fiber on the surface) is rated by area. Pilling exceeding 5 mm diameter on any visible surface is a major defect.
• Blisters and bubbles: In coated materials, any blister larger than 2 mm in diameter is flagged. For leather, we look for insect bites, tick marks, and scar tissue that the factory did not avoid during cutting.
• Staining and discoloration: Any mark that does not wipe off with a dry cloth is a defect. Water spots from improper drying during the finishing process are a recurring issue we see particularly during Guangzhou's humid summer months (June through September).

If more than 30% of the sampled units show any surface defect, even if each individually falls within the minor defect allowance, we flag the batch for a production process review. A systemic surface defect pattern indicates a problem in the cutting, finishing, or handling process that needs correction before future production runs.

03. Functional Testing: Zipper Open/Close (10 Cycles), Buckle/Snap Function, Strap Adjustment

Functional defects are the leading cause of post-purchase returns in the handbag category. A broken zipper or a failed buckle converts a satisfied customer into a return statistic instantly. Our functional testing protocol simulates real-world usage conditions to catch failures before the bag reaches the end user.

Zipper Open/Close Test (10 Cycles Minimum)

Every zipper on every sampled bag is cycled open and closed a minimum of 10 full cycles. We are checking for:

• Smooth glide: The slider should move without jerking or excessive force. If the slider sticks at any point, we note the exact position and inspect the zipper tape for fabric catch.
• Teeth engagement: After each cycle, we run a fingernail along the closed zipper track to detect any gaps where teeth did not properly interlock. A gap of more than 1 mm between closed teeth is a major defect.
• Slider lock function: For self-locking sliders (most zippers on handbags), we verify that the slider stays in position when released. A slider that drifts down under its own weight will cause the bag to gape open over time.
• Pull tab integrity: The zipper pull (the metal or plastic tab) should be firmly attached. We give a gentle tug equivalent to roughly 3 kg of force to ensure the pull does not detach from the slider body.

For bags with waterproof or splash-resistant zippers (typically coil zippers with a waterproof coating), we add a tissue-paper test. We place a strip of tissue paper inside the bag, close the zipper, and press firmly along the entire track. If the tissue paper emerges wet after the test or shows signs of pinch, the zipper seal is compromised.

Buckle and Snap Function

Each magnetic snap, turn-lock, and buckle closure is tested 10 times. For magnetic snaps, we measure the engagement force using a push-pull gauge. A magnetic snap that requires less than 1.5 kg of force to close is likely to pop open during normal use. A snap that requires more than 4 kg is frustrating for the user. We document the force measurement for every sampled unit and flag any reading outside the 1.5-4.0 kg range.

For turn-lock closures, we verify that the locking mechanism engages fully with an audible click. We also check for alignment: the locking pin should enter the receiving hole without forcing. Misaligned turn-locks are a common problem on leather bags where the flap thickness varies due to natural leather inconsistencies.

For D-ring and dog-clip buckles on strap attachments, we perform a pull test. Each buckle must withstand 15 kg of tensile load without deformation or failure. We use a digital force gauge with a 2-second hold at 15 kg.

Strap Adjustment Mechanism

Adjustable straps with slide buckles or ladder-lock hardware are tested through their full adjustment range three times. We check that the adjustment mechanism moves freely but holds position under load. A strap that slips when weighted with 3 kg (the approximate weight of a fully packed handbag) is a major functional defect. We also verify that the strap end, after full adjustment, does not protrude beyond the buckle by more than 2 cm, an aesthetic issue that frequently gets overlooked.

04. Dimension Verification: Digital Caliper Check of 5 Key Measurements

Dimensional accuracy is one of the most frequently violated specifications in handbag production, yet it is also one of the easiest to verify. Every sample bag in our inspection lot undergoes a 5-point dimensional check using Mitutoyo digital calipers with 0.01 mm resolution.

The five critical measurements we take on every sampled bag are:

1. Bag height (H): Measured from the bottom seam to the top opening edge, excluding the handle or strap. Tolerance: ±5 mm.
2. Bag width (W): Measured at the widest point of the body, typically the bottom gusset. Tolerance: ±5 mm.
3. Bag depth (D): Measured from front panel to back panel at the bottom gusset. Tolerance: ±3 mm.
4. Handle drop: The distance from the top of the handle to the top edge of the bag. Tolerance: ±3 mm. This is critical for shoulder bags where the drop determines how the bag sits on the body.
5. Strap length: The total adjustable length from one end of the strap to the other, fully extended. Tolerance: ±10 mm for a standard 100-130 cm strap.

We record each measurement individually on the inspection worksheet. If any single measurement falls outside the specified tolerance, that bag is flagged as a dimensional defect. If more than 10% of the sampled bags have any out-of-tolerance measurement, we consider the entire batch to have a systemic dimensional issue and recommend rejection.

Why such strict tolerances? Consider a tote bag that ships with a specified height of 35 cm. Each bag is packed flat in a polybag, and 20 polybags are packed into a master carton. If the actual bag height is 37 cm, the carton dimensions no longer fit correctly, the carton bulges, and during container loading, you lose stacking efficiency. For a container carrying 500 master cartons, a 2 cm error per bag cascades into a 10-15% reduction in cartons per container, directly increasing your per-unit shipping cost.

We also measure material thickness at three points on each bag: the main body panel, the flap or top closure, and the strap. For genuine leather, we expect consistent thickness within ±0.2 mm across all three points. Leather that is thinner at the strap attachment points creates a weak point that will fail under load.

05. Hardware Inspection: Plating Quality, Engraving Depth, Alignment

Hardware is the jewelry of a handbag. Poor-quality hardware cheapens the entire product, regardless of how good the leather or stitching may be. Our hardware inspection covers three dimensions: the plating quality, the engraving depth and clarity, and the alignment precision.

Plating Quality

We visually inspect every piece of exposed metal hardware under magnification (10x jeweler's loupe) for plating defects:

• Pitting: Small craters in the plating surface caused by impurities in the electroplating bath. Any pitting visible at 10x magnification on visible surfaces is a minor defect; on the front face of a buckle or logo plate, it is a major defect.
• Peeling and flaking: If the plating lifts from the base metal at any edge, the hardware will corrode within months. We flex-plate test a sacrificial hardware piece from each production batch by bending it 30 degrees and checking for plating separation.
• Rough edges: Hardware should have no sharp edges or burrs. We run a cotton ball along every edge of every buckle, zipper pull, and rivet. If the cotton snags, the hardware needs additional polishing.
• Color uniformity: For antique brass, brushed nickel, and black nickel finishes, we compare the hardware color against the approved gold master sample. Inconsistent bath temperatures during electroplating produce visible shade variation across pieces from the same batch.

For shipments going to EU markets, we also verify compliance with REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 regarding nickel release. The EU limits nickel release from post-assembly hardware to 0.5 μg/cm²/week. We request the factory's third-party test report from SGS or Bureau Veritas confirming nickel release within limits. Without this documentation, EU customs can detain the shipment and impose fines.

Engraving Depth and Clarity

Brand marks, logo plates, and decorative engravings must have a minimum depth of 0.3 mm to remain legible after years of use. We measure engraving depth using a depth gauge micrometer. We also check for:

• Ghosting: Faint secondary impressions caused by the die bouncing during stamping. Ghosting is unacceptable on brand logos.
• Fill quality: For enamel-filled logo plates, the enamel should be level with the metal surface, not recessed or domed. Uneven fill creates a cheap appearance and will chip over time.
• Debris in lettering: We check that all engraved letters and numbers are free of plating residue, which indicates inadequate cleaning after the plating process.

Alignment Precision

Misaligned hardware is one of the most visible quality indicators. We verify that:

• Rivets and studs are centered on their webbing or strap within ±1 mm.
• Logo plates are parallel to the seam line within 2 degrees of rotation. A crooked logo plate is immediately noticeable and signals poor attention to detail.
• D-rings and O-rings are centered in their webbing loops. Off-center rings cause the strap to twist during use.
• Turn-lock receiving holes align perfectly with the locking pin. We close each turn-lock 5 times and check for friction marks. Any scratching indicates misalignment that will worsen with use.

06. Interior Check: Lining Stitching, Pocket Count, Label Placement

The interior of a handbag is where cost-cutting becomes most visible. Consumers may not inspect the lining closely in a store, but they will notice a torn pocket seam or a misaligned zipper on the very first day of use. Our interior inspection is as thorough as the exterior check, if not more so, because interior defects directly impact the user's daily experience.

Lining Stitching

We turn every sampled bag inside out (or as far as the construction allows) to examine the lining stitching. Key checks include:

• Seam allowance: The lining seam allowance should be a minimum of 8 mm from the edge of the fabric to the stitch line. Insufficient seam allowance causes the lining to tear away from the seam under normal loading.
• Stitch density: Lining stitch density should be 6-8 stitches per inch (SPI). Lower SPI indicates the factory rushed the assembly and the seam may be weak.
• Thread type: The lining thread should match the lining fabric in color (or be specified differently in the tech pack). White thread on a black lining looks unprofessional and suggests the factory used whatever thread was on the machine.
• Unfinished edges: Lining edges should be either serged (overlocked) or bound. Raw fabric edges will fray over time, creating loose threads that tangle with the bag's contents.

Pocket Count and Configuration

We physically count every pocket against the tech pack specification. It is surprisingly common for factories to omit a zippered pocket or combine two slip pockets into one to reduce assembly time by 30-45 seconds per bag. For an order of 1,000 bags, that 30-second saving represents 8.3 hours of labor, a significant incentive for the factory to shortcut.

We verify not just the presence of each pocket but also its functionality. Slip pockets must be deep enough to hold a smartphone securely (minimum 15 cm depth for front pockets, 17 cm for main interior pockets). Zippered pockets are tested with the same 10-cycle open-close protocol as the main compartment zippers. We also verify the pocket placement: a slip pocket positioned too low in the interior forces the user to dig into the bottom of the bag to retrieve small items.

For bags with key leash or key ring attachments inside a pocket, we tug-test the attachment point with 5 kg of force. Key leashes that detach under load are a common failure point on mid-range handbags.

Label Placement and Content Verification

Every handbag destined for North American or European markets must carry specific labels. We verify four label types:

1. Brand/care label: Usually sewn into the interior side seam. Must match the approved artwork for font, color, and placement. We check that the label is centered in the seam and lies flat without puckering.
2. Fiber content label: Required by the FTC in the US and by EU Regulation 1007/2011 in Europe. The stated fiber percentages must match the actual materials used. For GRS-certified RPET materials, the label must reference the recycled content percentage and the certification body.
3. Country of origin label: "Made in China" must appear in English for the US market and may need to be in the local language for other markets. The label must be permanently attached and legible.
4. RN or CA number (US only): For brands selling to major US retailers, the Registered Identification Number or Canadian equivalent must appear on the label.

We photograph every label on every sampled bag and compare it to the approved label artwork. A single label error can trigger a full shipment detention by US Customs and Border Protection, so this step is non-negotiable.

07. Weight Verification: ±5% from Spec — Important for Shipping Cost Calculation

Weight may seem like a secondary concern compared to aesthetics and function, but in international trade, weight directly affects your bottom line. Every kilogram of deviation from the specification multiplies across the entire shipment, inflating freight costs or, worse, triggering chargebacks from logistics partners.

Here is the math. Suppose your handbag specification states 0.8 kg per bag including the dust bag and polybag. You ship 2,500 units in 100 master cartons (25 bags per carton). The expected total shipment weight is 2,000 kg. If the actual per-bag weight is 0.9 kg (a 12.5% deviation), your total weight becomes 2,250 kg. The freight forwarder, who quoted based on 2,000 kg chargeable weight, either issues a surcharge or reprices the entire shipment. On sea freight from Guangzhou to Los Angeles, that extra 250 kg can cost $150-$300 in unexpected fees.

Our protocol requires that every sampled bag be weighed on a calibrated digital scale with 1 gram resolution. We record the individual weight of each bag (inclusive of all accessories: dust bag, care card, hang tag, polybag) and calculate the average weight for the sample.

Our tolerance is ±5% from the specified weight. For a bag specified at 0.8 kg, we accept individual weights between 0.76 kg and 0.84 kg, and the sample average must fall within this same range. If the sample average exceeds 0.84 kg, we flag the deviation and investigate the root cause. Common causes include:

• Heavier hardware substitution: The factory used zinc alloy instead of aluminum for buckles and feet, adding 50-80 g per bag.
• Thicker material: The lining or main fabric GSM is higher than specified. A 210gsm lining substituted with 250gsm adds 30-50 g per bag.
• Extra components: The factory added an internal stiffener or additional padding that was not in the spec.
• Moisture absorption: In Guangzhou's humid season (70-90% relative humidity), leather and fabric bags can absorb 2-4% of their weight in moisture. This is temporary but still affects shipping weight.

If weight deviation exceeds 5% and the root cause is material substitution (not moisture), we treat it as a major defect. The factory must either revert to the specified materials or renegotiate the shipping terms to account for the actual weight.

08. Packaging Inspection: Polybag Seal, Dust Bag Quality, Box Condition

Packaging is your product's first and last line of defense. It protects the handbag during transit, preserves its appearance for retail display, and in many cases serves as the customer's unboxing experience. A scratched bag inside a torn dust bag arriving in a crushed carton creates a negative brand impression before the customer even sees the product.

Polybag Seal and Quality

Each individual handbag should be wrapped in a clear polypropylene (PP) bag before being placed into the dust bag or directly into the master carton. We check that:

• The polybag is sealed: Either with a closure sticker, heat seal, or self-sealing adhesive strip. Open polybags offer no protection against dust and moisture.
• The polybag is adequately sized: It should fit the bag snugly without excessive loose material that can wrinkle and cause pressure marks. But it should not be so tight that insertion stresses the bag's shape.
• Chain restriction labels (US market): If the polybag has a drawstring or closure cord, it must carry the required suffocation warning label per 16 CFR Part 1500.
• Anti-tarnish paper: For bags with silver or gold-plated hardware, we verify that anti-tarnish tissue paper is included inside the polybag. Hardware tarnishing during ocean transit is a common complaint that is entirely preventable with proper packaging.

Dust Bag Quality

If your order includes branded dust bags, we inspect each one as though it were a product itself. We verify that the dust bag material weight matches the spec (typically 60-80 gsm non-woven fabric or 100-120 gsm cotton canvas for premium brands). We check the stitching on the dust bag seams and the drawstring cord quality. A torn dust bag seam on the first use is a minor defect that nonetheless irritates the customer.

We also count dust bags. It sounds basic, but we have found shipments where the dust bag quantity was 5-10% short of the handbag quantity, because the factory ran out of dust bag stock and decided to "catch up later." Every handbag must have its dust bag packed with it at the time of inspection.

Master Carton Condition

We inspect a sample of master cartons for structural integrity. The carton should be made of single-wall or double-wall corrugated board as specified in the packaging spec (typically 150 lb burst strength / 32 ECT for domestic, 200 lb / 44 ECT for export). We check that:

• Carton flaps are properly sealed with pressure-sensitive tape (minimum 5 cm width, applied to both top and bottom seams)
• Cartons are not overfilled (the flaps should close flat without bowing) or underfilled (excessive empty space causes collapse during stacking)
• No crushed corners, water damage, or tears from handling
• Internal dividers or inserts are present if specified (common for shipments containing multiple bag styles or colors in a single carton)

For more detailed guidance on packaging and logistics protection, refer to our Export Packaging and ISTA 3A Guide.

09. Shipping Mark Verification: Address, Carton Count, Barcode Scan

A perfectly manufactured handbag is worthless if it ends up in the wrong warehouse. Shipping mark errors are among the most expensive mistakes in international logistics, and they are entirely preventable with a 15-minute verification step.

Every carton in the shipment carries a shipping mark, usually printed on a self-adhesive label affixed to two adjacent sides of the carton (never just one side). The shipping mark contains:

• Consignee name and address: The full legal name and physical delivery address of the recipient.
• Carton number: A sequential number (e.g., "1 of 100," "2 of 100," etc.) that enables the consignee to verify that all cartons have arrived.
• Style number and color code: Identifies the contents, so the warehouse can route cartons to the correct storage area.
• Net weight and gross weight: In kilograms.
• Country of origin: "Made in China."
• Handling icons: Such as the umbrella (keep dry), wine glass (fragile), and arrows (this side up).

Our verification process is methodical. We count every single carton in the shipment and compare the total to the packing list. Any discrepancy between the physical carton count and the documented count stops the loading process until the factory accounts for the difference.

We then randomly select 20% of the cartons and scan their barcodes using a handheld barcode scanner connected to our inspection tablet. The scanned data is cross-referenced against the digital packing list in real time. We verify that the style number, color code, and carton sequence number encoded in the barcode match the shipping document.

For shipments that require it, we also verify the SSCC-18 (Serial Shipping Container Code) barcode compliance. Major retailers including Walmart, Target, and Amazon require GS1-128 barcode labels on every inbound carton. The barcode must encode the correct Application Identifier data and be printed at the correct size (minimum 37 mm x 25 mm quiet zone) to be scannable by the retailer's receiving equipment. A barcode that fails to scan at the retailer's dock results in a chargeback of $50-$150 per carton depending on the retailer's vendor compliance policy.

We also photograph the shipping mark on each sampled carton and attach the photos to the inspection report. If any label is smudged, torn, or illegible, the factory must reprint and replace it before loading.

Finally, we verify the container seal number. The seal number on the container door is recorded and cross-checked against the bill of lading. This ensures that the container you are loading today is the same container that arrives at your destination, and that no unauthorized access occurs during transit.

10. Photo Documentation: 20+ Photos Per Batch for Client Approval

A picture is worth a thousand words, and in quality control, a photo is worth a thousand dollars in potential dispute resolution. If a client receives a shipment and claims a defect, the inspection photos are the definitive evidence of whether that defect existed before container loading.

Our standard photo documentation protocol captures a minimum of 20 photographs per inspection batch. These photographs are organized into five categories and uploaded to a shared album within 24 hours of the inspection.

Category 1: Overall Batch Overview (4-5 photos)

We photograph the entire production batch arranged on the factory floor, showing the full scope of the shipment. This provides a visual record of the batch size and confirms that the entire lot is physically present and packed. We also photograph the sample selection process, showing the cartons from which samples were drawn.

Category 2: Front and Back of Each Sampled Bag (8-10 photos)

Every sampled bag is photographed from the front, back, both sides, bottom, top opening, and interior. The bag is placed on a neutral gray background with a color calibration card included in the frame. These photos allow the client to see the exact visual condition of each sampled unit and compare it to the pre-production sample photos.

Category 3: Functional Test Evidence (3-4 photos)

We photograph the functional testing process: the digital scale showing the bag weight, the caliper displaying a key dimension, the force gauge reading during a snap test, and the zipper in the closed position. These photos are timestamped with a date card in the frame to prevent any dispute about when the tests were conducted.

Category 4: Defect Close-Ups (3-5 photos)

Every defect found during the inspection is photographed in close-up with a reference scale (a ruler or a coin for size comparison). The defect is marked with a red arrow sticker on the bag itself so there is no ambiguity about which flaw we are documenting. These photos are included in the inspection report next to the corresponding defect description.

Category 5: Packaging and Shipping Marks (3-4 photos)

We photograph the packed polybag with the bag inside, the sealed dust bag, the master carton exterior showing all four sides with shipping marks visible, and the container loading in progress. The container door with the seal number is photographed before sealing.

All photos are compressed to 2-4 MB each and organized in a structured folder naming convention: YYYY-MM-DD_ClientName_StyleNumber_InspectionType. We share the photo album with the client via a private link within 24 hours of completing the inspection, often before the written report is finished. This allows the client to visually assess the batch while we compile the detailed defect data.

Conclusion: Why This Protocol Matters

The ten steps I have outlined here represent the cumulative knowledge from over 300 pre-shipment inspections and four years of quality management in the handbag industry. Each step has been added because a real defect slipped past an earlier version of our protocol, and each step has been refined through dozens of iterations to balance thoroughness with practical efficiency.

A pre-shipment inspection takes our team an average of 4-6 hours for a standard 500-1,200 piece order. That is 4-6 hours that stands between you and a container full of potentially defective bags. The cost of this inspection, typically $350-$600 depending on location and complexity, is insignificant compared to the cost of a rejected shipment: chargebacks, return freight, restocking fees, lost sales, and damaged brand reputation.

If you are sourcing handbags directly from Chinese factories, I strongly recommend that you implement a structured OQC protocol similar to the one described here. Every factory will tell you they have "quality control." The question is whether their QC process matches the rigor of an independent, documented, statistically valid inspection.

This pre-shipment inspection is the final step in a complete quality management system. Incoming Quality Control (IQC) verifies raw materials before production begins. In-Process Quality Control (IPQC) monitors quality during cutting, stitching, and assembly. And OQC, which we have covered here, validates the finished product before it leaves the factory. If you haven't already, I encourage you to read our articles on IQC/IPQC/OQC and our Factory Audit Checklist to build a complete quality framework.

At BagSourcingChina, we offer independent pre-shipment inspection services for both our direct sourcing clients and for brands who have already established their own factory relationships and simply need a trustworthy QC partner on the ground. Our inspectors are trained on this exact 10-step protocol and carry calibrated measurement equipment to every inspection.

If you would like to discuss how our pre-shipment inspection service can protect your next handbag order, or if you want to learn more about our end-to-end Product Sourcing services, I invite you to reach out directly.

Or reach us directly: team@bagsourcingchina.com | WhatsApp: +86 198 7887 9335